this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Out of the loop

10780 readers
1 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t get what the problem is? Anyone can elaborate.

Edit: Thank you all for shedding more light on this topic. I’ve never really used flatpak but I do understand it better now!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

All of these services are very new. Exactly what people want out of them — including what the people operating instances want out of them — is still being worked out.

This is not a commercial production service that you have a contract with. It's an experimental system run by volunteers who don't all have the same ideas in mind. People aren't just working out the kinks — the process of discovering what this is all really for is still ongoing.

Expect friction. Expect weirdness. Expect rapid growth and, therefore, rapid change.

Also, expect people to fuss when they get surprised they can't do something they want to. That's also normal.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

To clarify a minor point, beehaw isn't new. It was established in Feb 2022, and it's been thriving with a relatively small community up until this months crazy growth. They're not so much finding their feet as trying to maintain an existing communities safety in the face of rapid growth.

[–] TiffyBelle@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Seems they're just discovering what being "federated" actually means.

[–] Mysteriarch@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's the other way around: new people and instances are learning that federation also means that other servers don't want to federate with you, and that that's okay. This is different from the usual 'freeze peach' stuff, this is just communities saying 'we don't want to hear you'.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)