this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
276 points (94.8% liked)
Gaming
2902 readers
53 users here now
!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.
Our Rules:
1. Keep it civil.
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.
2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.
I should not need to explain this one.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.
Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Logo uses joystick by liftarn
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I just question why they have to use those rooms at all when they have the ability to do a site-to-site transport. Just beam my ass from the bridge; the fuck do I gotta walk down to another room for?
From my understanding, there's more risk involved in site-to-site than actually stepping on the pad.
Way less if you're going from pad to pad.
When my atoms are being scattered across space, you bet I'd rather walk to the transporter room. I'd prefer a shuttle though.
something something bones
You are correct. By the TNG era site-to-site transport had become reliable enough that it could be used as needed, but having a pad at one end or the other (or both) of a transport was still safer. It was also more energy-efficient, though that's less of a concern.
Always a good idea to make things efficient, but "the transporters take too much power" is a sentence you will never hear on a galaxy class at least. Those monsters had insane power generation capability.