this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
-1 points (46.7% liked)
Individual Climate Action
149 readers
46 users here now
Discuss actions that we can directly take as individuals to reduce environmental harm.
related communities (decentralized only)
somewhat closely related to individual action:
- !vegan@slrpnk.net - Chatter on reducing GHG by way of reducing consumption of animal products (not necessarily environment-specific)
- !vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !veganism@sopuli.xyz
- !vegan@hexbear.net - Another vegan community, but apparently unreachable from slrpnk.net
- !activist_investing@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
- !nolawns@slrpnk.net - Landscaping in diverse low-waste ways
- !buyitforlife@slrpnk.net - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- !buyitforlife@discuss.tchncs.de - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- !fixing@slrpnk.net - fix it, don’t replace it
- !fixit@disflux.org
- !righttorepair@midwest.social - exercise your right to fix stuff
- !right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de - exercise your right to fix stuff
- !sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.org - sustainable technology
- !permacomputing@lemmy.sdf.org - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- !permacomputing@slrpnk.net - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- !zerowaste@slrpnk.net - To discuss waste avoidance
- !anticonsumption@sopuli.xyz
- !solarpunktravel@slrpnk.net - sustainable travel, if you must travel
less closely related to individual action:
- !collapse@slrpnk.net
- !collapse@sopuli.xyz
- !energy@slrpnk.net - For chatter specifically related to green energy
- !degrowth@slrpnk.net - Economics of reducing excessive consumption
- !cdr@slrpnk.net - Discuss CO₂ removal
- !treehuggers@slrpnk.net - Discuss forestation and reforestation
- !reclamation@slrpnk.net - Discuss reclaiming disturbed lands
- ~~!climate@slrpnk.net~~ ← ⚠ moderator locked a civil, on-topic, science-supported post without cause (see “The core of the climate social problem: stubbornness. The mitigating effect of psilocybin is worth a look” in the modlog)
- !climate@lemmy.stad.social
- !climate_lm@slrpnk.net ← climate change discussion without excessive moderation
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly the US is not a driving force in the international climate movement. US activists are, but the US as a country has been rather slow in dealing with the situation.
Then China does China and the US has very little influence over them. They built a lot of green technology and deploy it at a massive scale, but also increase emissions every year. I honestly doubt that would change with another US president.
Russia is even worse. They make money from selling oil and gas and also profit a lot from global warming as that turns a lot of Siberia and the Far East into arable land.
The US is the slowest to adapt and it’s unmatched in consumerism and personal car dependency. The US is also the most under the stranglehold of unchecked capitalism with an anti-interventionalist population. China is not going to shutdown the coal-fired plants and Russia is not going to cut back on oil and gas if the sacrifice is not mutual. Any one big player can be sanctioned and isolated by a trade war but if the US, Russia, and China don’t mutually agree in lock-step, a global systemic movement won’t happen.
There is a remote chance that Trump would get on board with climate action -- not because he would reverse his climate denial position or because he would pay any attention to activists, but simply under the threat of being at the losing end of a trade war.
Russia is NOT the Soviet Union. It is 9th most populous and has the 11th largest economy. The only thing they have going for them are nukes and a large military. Other then that they are about as important as Mexico. That is to say they are a regional power and very very far from being on any sort of level with the US or China.