Hockey

2428 readers

2 users here now

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.

List of Team-Specific Communities:

Metropolitan Division

Atlantic Division

Central Division

Pacific Division

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca

Thirdnipple79@lemmy.ca

dandroid@dandroid.app

dandroid@lemmy.ca

yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml

Should we lengthen the OT period? (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world to c/hockey@lemmy.ca

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Or just go back to the old system of 2 points per game. Winner takes 2 or a tie splits them.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

If you bring back the tie you can expect a lot of teams to start playing trap defence. There is a reason it was called the “dead puck era”.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I’m all for this. The OT and the point system is dumb for giving a point just for making it past 60 min - a win is a win is a win and only should be awarded points for winning.

I realize the shootout is a skills competition, essentially, but whether it’s a win via a skills competition or a rogue breakaway then it’s a win regardless. Split the tie because you couldn’t win in regulation and then lose OT all together except for playoffs and Cup finals where there HAS to be a winner.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 2 points 10 months ago

I personally prefer the shootout to the tie. But I would like every game to be worth 3 points instead of some games being worth 2 and a third point magically appearing if you go to OT.