Linux

48216 readers

848 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

What's the best way to have a .bashrc that I can use throughout systems? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 10 months ago by gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So, I just found out about a programme called SynthShell which kind of does the work for you and gives you a nice looking shell, the thing is that this also creates some config files and other stuff in my system, instead of just one .bashrc file to edit. What would be the best way to learn to have a nice looking bash where I can just have a backup of it that I can use throughout systems?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So you can do what you like, but if you are going down the road of shell customization, I recommend you first consider if bash is the shell you want to keep by googling around and reading some articles.

I personally use ZSH (and I cannibalized ohmyzsh for the few configs I wanted instead of taking the whole giant bastard of a thing) but fsh is a fine choice if you don't care about posix (a different discussion). There are some other options to consider as well, but if you're gonna configure, don't do it then do it again in a month with different syntax lol.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, recently after posting this I went down a rabbit hole and found out about zsh and fish and I kind of like fish so I'm thinking about going straight to that, what a hard choice.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

It's a deep rabbit hole lol.