138

‘Guilty until proven innocent’: Chinese firm challenges US law on Uygur forced labour (www.scmp.com)

submitted 6 months ago by filoria@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://archive.ph/m3ghL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 months ago

State Department Lawyers Concluded Insufficient Evidence to Prove Genocide in China - FP

https://archive.md/SFvMX

[-] voight@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago

Creepy mfs

[-] voight@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thanks, I collect these

[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

No shit.

[-] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah no shit, If no genocide is going on obv you won't have sufficient evidence

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

some legal experts suspect China’s behavior may fall short of actual genocide.

Isn't an all clear, it's far from it.

[-] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah you're right that is why china should stay guilty until proven innocent, even when the evidence for genocide is paper thin in first place

The source I posted is western and the fact that they even acknowledge a lack of evidence is quite telling.

Since it's impossible to prove a negative and taking western hegemony in (western) news sources into account makes i an almost impossible task to disprove the genocide narrative, I'll post the Chinese perspective which provides a much larger context: https://www.qiaocollective.com/education/xinjiang