Well tbf as well, innovative is as subjective as game of the year, what seems to be innovative to some might not be one for another. It's hard to define "innovation" because it's simply a process of putting in change on an established thing. Try google "innovative product of (year)" and you might see a tons of "isn't it just x but y" product.

In my case i haven't played Starfield nor Baldur's Gate 3 so i wouldn't know whether they deserve the award or not, if people think it does, hey, more power to them. Steam Award is a popularity contest voted by people anyway, taking it seriously is missing the point.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

innovative is as subjective as game of the year

I don't think I've actually heard a single person unironically assert Starfield is 'innovative'...

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I assert nothing though.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not saying you did. I'm saying while 'innovative' might be subjective, it's hard to see how it actually could deserve the 'most innovative' title when practically nobody would agree to that claim. It's fairly obvious the vote had little to do with the actual game.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 0 points 10 months ago

Even if they think it is, looking at todays online environment, i understand why it's not an open statement. I remember the game is well received on launch, then it slowly slip to mixed and negative a month or so later, i shaped my opinion based on this.

For comparison, No Man Sky won Innovative Award by GDC for the launch version.

I don't really take award seriously, less so with Steam Award. Watching people react to it is still funny though, ngl.