this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
361 points (96.2% liked)
Asklemmy
43965 readers
1007 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree that it's stupid to reuse something as common as ETA, but 'edit' does not necessarily imply addition.
But if you put edit: followed by text then yeah it does imply you added it.
Supplying additional context can change how people interpret something, but "edit" on its own can mean that you have:
Any of which is adding to the comment. Whether by adding a removal or adding lol.
Edit is synonymous with changed. It isn't synonymous with... I dunno, remove or add.
That's what I'm saying: it is a change, but "edit to add" is not inherently redundant.
It is... Any change is adding to something. Whether that be through subtraction or addition. I get where you're coming from and where the to add people come from... It's just a silly addendum that was added post hoc because of silly populism. ETA is already established as estimated time of arrival. There's no reason to also try to rethink a common acronym. Beyond that, there's also no reason to signify what you added, or where. You can sure just use ETA to add anything directly after while leaving your OG comment the same, but nobody will know what you edited anyway unless it's an instance that records that stuff.
I think it's the same argument as debating whether nothing is something at the root.
Even then, it's a superfluous addition when you have to specify okay I've only edited anything after this ETA when the definition means you could've added anything anywhere.
Edit in addition, edit after comment, any variation leads to the same issue. It's just... So... Pointless.
It even takes more keystrokes! Whether you use capslock or shift for Edit: or ETA: l. E: Is just so much better.
Ok - I wasn't arguing semantics, but you sure are. :)
I mostly agree with your perspective on the broader, philosophical aspects of edits. However, our discussion is specifically about the practical use of ‘ETA’ in online contexts, not the semantics of editing. Introducing a philosophical angle, while interesting, is not particularly useful here.