this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)

science

14678 readers
75 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

source because I'm pretty sure that mp4 won't play here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I was curious if this was based on a low winter sun at a polar attitude, but it's not. The location in Chile is only 24°S (Miami is 25°N) and the nightfall timing makes me think this mid-November. That puts the sun in the frame for half the span of the day frames. So instead of being a cool example of a weak sun as I thought, someone spent 3x as much effort to simulate the placement of celestial objects to exemplify how we are just a little rock spinning in space. The stars don't come out at night, the day just hides them. We're always sitting under the stars. Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2849/

And actually, given that that xkcd was posted Nov 1, I can't help but wonder if it's related.