Asklemmy

43917 readers

1097 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Are there any blog system that uses Activity Pub? (programming.dev)

submitted 10 months ago by muhyb@programming.dev to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Don't know if we already have this but if not, this could be a new breath for running away from Google's polluted, hard to find any real useful stuff SEO World. With Kagi's optimization for activity pub, it's easier to find content within the Federation. With a blog system that supports activity pub, people can get interaction from Mastodon, Lemmy, PeerTube etc. And the best part is, you can do all these stuff with your self-hosted sites.

If we already have this, please let me know.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

add the ability to control who is able to subscribe

This seems tricky to enforce on a per-user basis since content federated to another instance for one user could easily be shared with another user on that instance without the original instance ever knowing about that.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

It definitely does get tricky. In general, guarantees about control over the network get tricky, and it seems like a limitation of the fediverse for this sort of stuff.

Imposing limitations can maybe go far though. Keeping such users on a single instance or on a single platform could be helpful? I don’t knitter this space unfortunately. Maybe some cryptography would be necessary?