this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
60 points (96.9% liked)

United Kingdom

4036 readers
261 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 16 points 8 months ago (4 children)

proposed changes to official figures that the ONS says will provide “an improved and more efficient health and social care statistical landscape”.

Ah yes, because the first thing I always think when reading about any deaths among the homeless is 'is this statistical landscape efficient?'

[–] whelks_chance@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You should. If government level decisions are being made based on this data, we should know that it's sound. Otherwise people resort to using gut feel to solve problems.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 4 points 8 months ago

That ship has sailed, the stock market is just a measure of rich people's gut feelings and we've done wars over it.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

I might first ask if it was accurate. Not efficient.

load more comments (1 replies)