this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
82 points (98.8% liked)

United Kingdom

4094 readers
123 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

Neoliberal austerity would prevent anything like this from happening on a large scale. You can see this with all the concerns about "cost".

The "budget" on these things should be 'infinite'. Spend whatever amount of labor and resources available to build the plant. Instead they focus on short term profits.

No wonder why China is spending more on renewable energy than rest of the world combined. Because China understands money isn't real, they are more than willing to give as much as possible for renewable energy.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Nuclear is not renewable energy.

It’s not even green energy.

Renewables are the superior choice in price and effect.

[–] Naich@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There needs to be a mix of sources, and unfortunately nuclear is the best way to provide a reliable source that can be ramped up or down instantly to plug gaps in supply from renewables.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ramping up nuclear is not instant and is not ideal because it causes more waste by altering the working lifetime of the fuel.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Even then it's preferable to gas

[–] Naich@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They should have been ramping it up 20 years ago. Short-termism fucks us again. Better late than never, I suppose.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gas is not a renewable or green.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

... So what do you when there's no wind or sun?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)