Programmer Humor

19589 readers

1877 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

431

git commit -m "minor fixes" +26858 -69429 (feddit.de)

submitted 10 months ago by oeLLph@feddit.de to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] oeLLph@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Why user standard version and conventional commits in the first place? When this is only a fraction of purposeful commit messages

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Because if you are creating a changelog automatically based on the commit messages it will be very public and that user will look bad.

https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/about/#tooling-for-conventional-commits

[–] oeLLph@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

conv commut are used here... Somehow they know how get around thing like git hook no-verify :/

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago

Changelogs are published to stakeholders. So what I'm saying is you don't have to try to enforce a commit style using got hooks if you have public shaming at your disposal.