this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
254 points (98.1% liked)

Games

16396 readers
820 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
254
Baldur’s Gate 3 boss says gamers don’t want mass subscriptions (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 8 months ago by Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de to c/games@sh.itjust.works
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10828130

Always good to see someone in the industry push back on all of these shitty tactics the AAA publishers want to push.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't actually play a lot of games, so it doesn't make sense for me, but honestly for people who do play a wide variety of different games, Microsoft's GamePass is a brilliant deal. A Netflix-like subscription where you pay one amount per month and get access to all the games in their library, including patches and DLC.

At $11/month, just 3 AAA games per year and it's a better deal. Or 7 $20 games per year, which I know a lot of gamers will easily go through.

But a subscription to an individual game? It better be getting quality ongoing support, with content, bug patches, etc. It made sense back in the day for MMOs, but it's a damn tight rope to walk. And it can only work for the types of games that people are gonna sink their lives into, with hours per week over years. It's a very hard sell, and in not sure I'd pay it even for the two games (from the same franchise) that currently get 90% of my gaming time.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I almost never play MP games, but I think a subscription makes a ton of sense for those since it supports server costs.

But for SP games, I would really rather not be on the clock. I've been halfway through a Netflix series when it gets taken off way to often, and I don't want that for games too. I just don't have a ton of time for games, so sometimes a game will game a year, other times I'll get through it in a week.

I also prefer indie games to AAA, and selection on a subscription service would probably be mediocre for the games I like to play.

So no subscriptions for me, thanks.