this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
74 points (97.4% liked)

UK Politics

3090 readers
59 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you're in a safe seat then by all means.

But I'll say to everyone here the same thing I say to Americans. Yous need to be pushing hard for a better electoral system. First past the post shouldn't qualify as democracy, in my opinion. It's just that bad. IRV is the bare minimum that should be acceptable. But ideally, you should push for some sort of proportional system like STV or MMP.

Electoral reform should be every intelligent voter's highest priority, because without it you'll always be stuck with the same two parties doing the same dull shit.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Shame neither party are actually offering electoral reform (and why would they - the current form works perfectly well, for them)

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

With the right pressure, I think Labour might be convinced. The Conservatives only got a majority at the last election because of FPTP. The two elections before that were even worse for the Conservatives' overall vote.

This is especially true if Labour is only able to govern in coalition with LibDems and SNP.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lmfao, ok.. You go ahead and pin your hopes on the person who has literally purged Labour of anyone even slightly left leaning, who thinks racism is a joke, who thinks how disabled people are treated is just fine, who doesn't give a fuck about the poor, who is only there to serve the establishment - to change the system that offers him the only shot at power. See how that works out for you...

Meanwhile those of us already targeted by the government, who know new labour isn't going to change a thing will continue to suffer while you folks pat yourselves on the back for picking the "lesser evil" because you're too scared of actually standing up for yourselves.

[–] Sarahw@mastodon.green 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

@DessertStorms @GreyShuck @Fudoshin @Zagorath
That's why I'm hoping that no party wins overall majority. PR is the only way things will change.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I doubt a coalition of the two (which Starmer would undoubtedly agree to) wouldn't be any better unfortunately..

The fact is the system isn't broken, it's working exactly as intended. Which is why we need to abolish it entirely. Hanging hopes on electoral politics is continuing to play the same rigged game hoping those in charge will change the rules.. They aren't going to.

[–] Sarahw@mastodon.green 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

@DessertStorms @GreyShuck @Fudoshin @Zagorath
You're right, but without a full-scale revolution how do we get there?

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

By accepting that a revolution is necessary. There is no fixing ("reforming") capitalism. Or a monarchy. Or a parliament that consists of an entire house of unelected "gentry". The system was never meant to serve us and it never will.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Capitalism has been reformed, repeatedly. There are different forms of it, it evolves all the time. That was a key part of Marx's philosophical stance, that capitalism was an ever-changing, revolutionary force, both destructive and creative; that was what he admired about it, in fact! Clement Attlee and other world leaders reformed capitalism with the Bretton Woods agreement and the many reforms we made post-war within countries. I think it's very doubtful that a post-war revolution in the UK would've turned out well, given how the other post-war revolutions shaped up. Even Thatcher 'reformed capitalism' in this country (very much for the worse, obviously!).

As to your specific points... we have reformed all those things, repeatedly. It's really quite odd to point to a country that has a constitutional monarchy, which used to be an absolute monarchy, and insist there's no reforming that monarchy. It's the way it is because we reformed it. In fact, we last reformed it in 2013. And the Lords was last reformed in 2015. The Commons was also reformed, for the better, in 2015 to allow recall of MPs.

Now, if you agree that these things are better than the alternative, that is the same thing as agreeing with reform. I think you and I probably agreee that the reforms didn't go far enough, or even that it would be better to do away with some of these things altogether, but it's not true to say that they can't be reformed; abolishing the monarchy would be a reform, albeit a major one. Barbados did it very recently, again without a revolution. Even changing the Lords to an elected chamber or getting rid of the last Hereditary Peers would be reforms, and I imagine we'd both welcome them, up to a point!

[–] Sarahw@mastodon.green 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

The thing to remember is that as scary and overwhelming as a revolution can seem, it isn't just on the front lines, it requires a lot more than just a violent uprising, it requires a base to fall back on as well as significantly more people working behind the scenes than are on the front lines.

Building up communities that care about and for each other, spreading information and solidarity, building dual powers (communal services to replace the failing/for profit ones we're made to rely on, from food banks to money banks to childcare to healthcare), spreading propaganda and so on, all are vital and need to be happening before any hypothetical storming of any institution could even happen.

We can do it.

[–] Sarahw@mastodon.green 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

@DessertStorms @GreyShuck @Fudoshin @Zagorath
I agree that starmer would work with the Tories, but I don't think the Tories will work with Labour.
Our only chance of PR is a coalition between Labour and Lib Dems/Greens.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Labour in coalition is definitely the best chance it has of happening.

That dude's idea that Labour and the Conservatives would govern in coalition is laughable. In a wartime emergency, maybe, but the two parties just do not get along enough to do it if there is any other option.

I think Labour could probably be talked into getting on board with it over time, too. UK politics is at a point now where Labour is being hurt by FPTP. I think convincing them to go with PR (rather than IRV) is more difficult, but even that would be a big step up.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

First of all, I'm not a fucking dude, second off all, have you been paying any attention to new Labour as opposition??? They literally oppose nothing the Tories are doing. NOTHING

They represent the same people, and those people aren't you

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Labour are more right wing than I would like, so I agree with you up to a point.

However, to say Labour 'literally oppose nothing the Tories are doing' is plainly untrue. They voted against the Rwanda bill just two days ago, for example, and have promised to repeal it when they come into power (assuming it passes the Lords). If voting against something, arguing against it and promising to repeal it don't constitute opposing the Tories, I don't know know what does!

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's really no chance, short of WWIII, that Labour would enter a coalition with the Tories or vice-versa, and I don't really understand why you think there could be.

IIRC, Starmer said some time ago that if Labour didn't win a majority, they would form a minority government rather than a coalition with anyone (also relevant to !Zagorath@aussie.zone's comment).

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

I don't think the Tories will work with Labour.

they will do whatever keeps them in power.