this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
262 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

58138 readers
4489 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Users of those services will be steered toward the web
  • Searches indicate apps from Meta may also be unavailable

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/4kfYI

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ji17br@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m not confused at all. The reason people get headaches it’s a tech issue. Not a VR issue. Low resolution screen, low refresh rate, and heavy headsets are the cause of those issues. Technology has not advanced enough to solve those issues. Apple has created the best option so far, but there’s still a lot of room to improve.

Due to the better tech in Vision Pro I wouldn’t be surprised if the amount of people getting headaches compared to other headsets is lower, but not zero unfortunately.

I’m not sure how you can say in good conscience that people don’t dislike the price. Go into any thread regarding Vision Pro and price will by far be the most discussed topic.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's because the technology sucks. If it really was revolutionary, $3500 would be a bargain.

People pay that right now for gaming computers. If it could replace that, it would be worth it. Many people own toys more expensive than that (motorcycles, boats, jet skis). People with mobility issues spend that amount on their wheelchair and can barely go to the Grand Canyon, let alone more remote places.

It's just a technology issue. It sucks.

[–] ji17br@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The technology is years ahead of anything else.

Why are you comparing bleeding edge technology to a motorbike? Literally the stupidest comparison I’ve seen.

You clearly just want to shit on the product and have no intention to having an honest discussion.

[–] Streetdog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This has been pretty much the case in this community. It's more for people to praise the tech they're owning right now, and bitch about anything they don't own. I'm just browsing, not sure if there's a futurism community. Your arguments would find better ground there, unfortunately.

[–] ji17br@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Sadly I suspect you are right.