Masks prevent one on one transmission. Washing your hands prevents many to many transmission. Surfaces are touched by more people than you’ll directly interact with in a day

Almost like more than one person breathes the air in a room, just like 'surfaces are touched by more people than you'll directly interact with in a day'. If you're on an airplane or working as a doctor seeing sick people, it makes sense to wear a mask even if you aren't displaying symptoms, because masks reduce the transmission of airborne viruses, both for you and for the people around you. For the same reason washing your hands is efficacious when touching lots of public surfaces, wearing a mask is efficacious when breathing the same air as lots of potentially sick and at-risk individuals, especially if you are doing so frequently.

I'm not concerned with what your personal practices are with your mask-wearing, but you've been downplaying the efficacy of masks this entire thread and then backsliding when you meet resistance. You're making up rational based on "wearing a mask is inconvenient", vibes-based logic. You don't think masks are worth the inconvenience for healthcare workers, and I'm saying they objectively and meaningfully reduce the spread, and whatever perceived inconvenience you feel is worth it if it prevents transmission in high traffic and high-risk environments.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

more than one person breathes the air in a room

Sure, but air is also continuously recycled in a building. The CDC recommends 5 air replacements per hour, and most commercial buildings are above that.

working as a doctor seeing sick people

Agreed. But that's not what I'm talking about. I explicitly said I would wear a mask if I'm sick, in close proximity to someone who is known to be sick, or in close proximity to someone who is known to be at significant risk of becoming sick.

All of that is completely within CDC recommendations.

Most people are not around sick or at risk people all day, so wearing a mask is pretty silly for them. The additional protection against someone who might be sick in public is minimal (you probably won't get COVID from a chance encounter with an asymptomatic carrier), especially if you've already been wearing it all day.

Handwashing helps prevent accidental contact, so it's highly recommended regardless. You should be washing your hands consistently throughout the day even if you don't work with sick or at risk people.

you've been downplaying the efficacy of masks this entire thread

Alternative perspective: you've been consistently misinterpreting what I've said.

I cited efficacy numbers, which are based on close proximity to a symptomatic individual. That's not the situation we're discussing, we're talking about all day use of masks even when not in the presence of a symptomatic carrier. You're getting at best 50% reduced risk of infection, probably much lower. If you're if you're in a commercial building with typical ventilation, asymptomatic carriers will have their breath sucked into the ventilation fairly quickly (typical office is probably ~5 cycles per hour, a hospital is probably more frequent). The risk for infection from proximity to someone who is merely a carrier is already quite low, and adding a mask doesn't meaningfully increase your protection.

That's why I'm opposed to all-day wearing of masks for most people. It's not going to meaningfully reduce your risk of infection. If you're around known sick or at-risk people, absolutely wear a mask. If you're not (i.e. you're part of the majority), wearing a mask is essentially pointless.

You don't think masks are worth the inconvenience for healthcare workers

I do, just not for every role of healthcare worker. Healthcare workers should wear one when in the presence of someone who is sick or at risk. If they're working with sick people, wear a mask. If they're doing well checks, routine procedures, etc, I don't see a point.

In other words, dress appropriately for the work you're doing. The CDC has reasonable recommendations here, and I follow them myself, and sometimes go beyond. I don't follow the "always wear a mask" mantra though; that's not what the CDC recommends, and that's not what any healthcare professional I've ever talked to recommends.

I feel like I've been very consistent here. Wear a mask if you're around sick or at risk people, don't bother if you're not (unless there's a local spike in cases or something that changes local guidance, but that should go without saying).

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Either you've misread the context of the post or you've intentionally jumped into a conversation about healthcare workers wearing protective gear and steered it towards a general 'i find masks uncomfortable so why bother' discussion. The reason you've been so aggressively downvoted is because the post is speaking specifically about preventing exposure to at-risk individuals in a healthcare context, and yet you've decided this is actually about you not wanting to wear a mask for your own benefit.

I feel like I’ve been very consistent here.

You responded to a post specifically about masking in a healthcare context, stating that you don't see a point in wearing a mask because you end up getting infected anyway
You then said "The mask doesn’t prevent the spread, it just slows it." in response to someone pointing out that it's not for you but for others
You had a whole-ass pedantic argument about "prevention" and "reduction", even after acknowledging that masks have significant efficacy (50-80% under correct usage), ignoring that risk reduction is what we're talking about when discussing prevention. (preventative care is never about reducing risk of illness to zero)
You then shifted goalposts, taking 'meaningful spread reduction' to instead mean 'moving toward complete eradication/containment', implying that if masks cannot eradicate infection then they shouldn't be used (??) (this makes my head fucking spin, are you really suggesting that preventative measures are only worthwhile if they can eradicate an illness completely? e.g. since not smoking doesn't eradicate my risk of lung cancer, why bother cutting it out at all??)
When challenged (i argued 50-80% was meaningful), you walked back your previously cited figures, since 'people don't wear them effectively so really it's not even 50%, it's less than that so really it's not effective'

The only thing you've done consistently is downplay the role masks play in reducing viral transmission, while constantly complaining how inconvenient they are.

I don’t follow the “always wear a mask” mantra though; that’s not what the CDC recommends, and that’s not what any healthcare professional I’ve ever talked to recommends.

Good thing nobody is advocating that here, you dense motherfucker.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Here's the original comment that I replied to:

Noone wants to work 24h shifts in an ffp2 if you don't really have to and also every colleague had like every possible infection during autumn already.

That comment got upvotes. I agreed with it, and gave more context. Here's my comment in full:

Yup. I'd rather get COVID than wear a mask all day every day. I will wear a mask if I know I'm sick, of hospitals are getting overwhelmed, or if I know I'll be around vulnerable people, but that's it. I took every precaution from 2020 on, and got sick anyway. It's going to happen, so I'd prefer to at least be comfortable than just delay the inevitable.

I got COVID two months ago and it sucked, and I'd rather repeat that than live my life with a mask.

I'm commiserating with healthcare professionals. They should only be expected to wear masks if they're directly working with sick or at risk people. There are a ton of healthcare jobs where that's absolutely not the case.

The only criticism I have for the nurse/doctor in that OP is that they didn't practice social distancing with the person wearing a mask. I don't think they should be expected to wear a mask for their whole shift, only in the moments where they're interacting with sick or at-risk people.

prevention vs reduction

I only brought that up in context. If you look, it wasn't until multiple back and forth comments that I bothered.

A healthcare professional isn't going to prevent all transmission of disease in a hospital or clinic, even if they mask up all day every day. So I'm absolutely okay with them being comfortable most of the time so they don't burn out on their job.

That's all I was trying to convey.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'll highlight the part of your comment that was the issue:

Yup. I’d rather get COVID than wear a mask all day every day. I will wear a mask if I know I’m sick, of hospitals are getting overwhelmed, or if I know I’ll be around vulnerable people, but that’s it. I took every precaution from 2020 on, and got sick anyway. It’s going to happen, so I’d prefer to at least be comfortable than just delay the inevitable.

I got COVID two months ago and it sucked, and I’d rather repeat that than live my life with a mask.

The comment you responded to didn't make the unsympathetic choice yours did; that wearing a mask was for your protection, as opposed to the protection of the patients. That is why yours received consternation and the other less-so.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's absolutely sympathetic, I'm being sympathetic toward the healthcare worker. It would really suck to have to wear a mask all day every day, so I completely understanding not doing that when the stakes are low.

The healthcare worker is likely to get sick regardless, though wearing a mask might delay things a bit. Why make the healthcare worker wear a mask when the risk is incredibly low? That's just going to lead to burnout.

I used myself as an example because I obviously cannot speak for other healthcare workers, but the whole intent was to sympathize with them.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not about the healthcare worker, it's about the PATIENT. Jesus.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And that's the problem!

It seems people are so entitled that they expect health care professionals to significantly inconvenience themselves for a marginal reduction in transmission risk. That's just ridiculous, I'd rather leave it up the medical professionals who are trained on such things to decide when a mask is and isn't necessary. CDC guidance for medical professionals does not recommend wearing masks for every shift (though it explains that's still safe), it only recommends wearing masks while in proximity to at risk individuals. Here's the CDC guidance for healthcare workers (source control means wearing a mask):

Source control is recommended for individuals in healthcare settings who:

Have suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or other respiratory infection (e.g., those with runny nose, cough, sneeze); or

Had close contact (patients and visitors) or a higher-risk exposure (HCP) with someone with SARS-CoV-2 infection, for 10 days after their exposure

Consider reading the full thing. Also note that policies can vary by state, county, and even medical center. But the CDC guidance at least matches what I've been saying, the recommendation is to wear a mask when sick or in close contact with someone who is sick (there are provisions for other scenarios as well).

But my point is, health care providers know the recommendations and policies, and they are most likely following them. So give your care provider a break, or ask nicely for them to mask up if it really bothers you.