this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
518 points (85.1% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6884 readers
206 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Wouldn't it be men making the decision on conscription policies though? A more liberal / less sexist government would be more likely to bin that.

The key difference I tend to see between men and women's issues is that men's issues are often caused by other men in power. Feminism, ironically enough, can also help with a lot of problems disenfranchised men have.

Sorry I'm rambling a bit.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Sooooo yes, everything you said is correct, but there's a missing piece of context: binning the military would mean binning South Korea as we know it, so nobody (liberal or conservative) is in favor of binning it. The lines are much more murky.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Binning a sexist conscription system is not anything close to “binning the military”

[–] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It very literally is, in South Korea's case.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How so?

Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

They could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago

Men are not a monolith.