this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
78 points (75.0% liked)
Technology
59593 readers
2954 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is entirely fabricated and opinionated bullshit from Forbes. There is no evidence that this is actually happening and the headline is extremely clickbait. Many other sites have covered this and I can't find any other than Forbes that take it this way. This is an opinion piece based on a response from a fucking chat bot despite that response semi conflicting with Google's official outline of the feature.
Google has announced an AI chat bot function for Bard. You can open a new conversation directly with Bard and in that conversation data is not encrypted and will be sent to Google. There is no evidence of it "reading through your history" or that future chats you have with actual humans are going to be collected or unencrypted.
If you read past all the "breaks" and such, the author themself even falls back on this:
Let me rephrase that. The author is quoting a fucking response from the BARD CHATBOT and then further extrapolating what the fucking chat bot said. This is not Google. This is A CHAT BOT.
All of the privacy changes posted by Google themselves do not outline anything more than your conversations with Bard being uploaded. But the author tries to then argue about bards own response he got.
The author is saying he's scared. And that Google will dance around a loophole its chat bot mentioned. But this is his own opinion about what he thinks will happen because of a response he got from an AI.
This is fucking ludicrous fear mongering.
God dammit I hate modern "journalism" so much.
I really wouldn't be surprised if Google did this though.
Plus, wouldn't it be an easy PR win for them to set the record straight.
For me these days, Google is guilty until proven innocent.
Dunno, dude, just that functionality on my phone is fkd up. E.g. "we can now train models in a federated way on a subset of your messages, we promise those are only messages you send to our chatbot and we only extract training results".
Nevermind the research showing how to compromise federated training, nevermind privellege escalation, nevermind the backdoor put in for the feds, and so on. I'ma stick to Signal.