I can’t help but think that cars (EV included) just aren’t the answer. I feel like bikes aren’t the answer either. I feel like the metro and high speed rail are.
Most people don’t drive because they like driving (US), most people drive because they have to. And that sucks. You shouldn’t feel like you’re forced to drive. Because that’s auto insurance and auto registration that you have to pay.
You can’t eliminate roads altogether. You need at least one or two lanes for fire trucks, ambulances, garbage trucks, etc. but you can create pockets of no car zones.
People like me who like cars, should be able to have places we store our cars. We should have places where we can explore the limits of our cars instead of driving through traffic. But that should be a strictly extracurricular activity.
In the no car pockets, you should be able to walk to a grocery store, hardware store, that has what you need. You should be able to have mixed zoning. Single family units shouldn’t be the norm. If I own a car but it’s not my dedicated form of transportation, I can buy a cooler car and I don’t need a garage next to where I live to store it. I can store it outside no car pockets so that I can take public transport to my car and then take my car to the track.
Yes, it’ll take awhile to get there but why aren’t we doing more to that end? Am I too idealistic?
The trouble with walkability is variety. I get in my car, I can reach shopping malls, clothing stores, restaurants of practically any cuisine, and the post office to send a letter.
Years ago I lived in a major city on the east coast with decent public transit and high "walkability index" ratings. I could walk to a bodega, three pubs, two pizza places, a chinese restaurant, an organic grocery store, and the gym. I biked to work and to school, and could take public transit to the regional rails to get out of the city if needed.
I still needed a car.
You can't carry a week's worth of groceries for a family on a bike, and certainly not when it's raining.
Public transit takes two or three times as much time compared to driving point to point. Walking could turn a 20 minute errand into a full day adventure. And if I need a specialty store, or to take my kids to the doctor, I'm not waiting around for a bus that may be an hour behind schedule.
The car should be the backup. There should be other options, more favorable options. Cheaper, cleaner, faster for when you just need to get somewhere. Walking is only a replacement when you live near everywhere you ever need to go and you have enough money to just have everything at your fingertips.
What on Earth for? I honestly can't think of a reason why you would need a car in a situation like that. I live in a very walkable neighborhood but with considerably less amenities and I get by just fine without a car or a bike.
No it does not. That's only true if cities invest all of their transportation budget into car-centric infrastructure. Public transit is way more efficient.
That's pretty arrogant to tell me the reality I lived is a lie. You say you can't think of any reasons when I just gave you a whole bunch of reasons. How should I interpret that?
Not that it matters, this isn't an opinion. I mean, you could go to google maps right now and see the difference.
Here was one of my commutes to work.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Aspen+Street+%26+Haverford+Avenue,+Philadelphia,+PA/Benjamin+Franklin+High+School,+550+N+Broad+St,+Philadelphia,+PA+19130/@39.9644239,-75.1921844,13z/data=!4m8!4m7!1m2!1m1!1s0x89c6c6e0603a75e7:0x60419d67af2d983e!1m2!1m1!1s0x89c6c7d3da35c16f:0x4d340bce9140c1f!3e0
Right now, 16 minutes by car and 32 minutes by public transit.
Here's a trip to Ikea.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/IKEA,+South+Christopher+Columbus+Boulevard,+Philadelphia,+PA/Benjamin+Franklin+High+School,+550+N+Broad+St,+Philadelphia,+PA+19130/@39.9372884,-75.1514966,13z/data=!4m8!4m7!1m2!1m1!1s0x89c6c8b2d85cab5d:0x6311fc151459e887!1m2!1m1!1s0x89c6c7d3da35c16f:0x4d340bce9140c1f!3e0
14 vs 35 minutes, but try carrying a couch home on the bus.
Here's another work commute.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/South+12th+Street+%26+Reed+Street,+Philadelphia,+PA/E+Erie+Ave,+Philadelphia,+PA/@39.9456148,-75.1338933,13z/data=!4m8!4m7!1m2!1m1!1s0x89c6c61a450a43cd:0xa68e23054f88f593!1m2!1m1!1s0x89c6b7c45c9a0245:0xcd9fb0b8c6c17e09!3e0
Currently 26 vs 48 minutes.
Keep in mind, all of those public transit numbers assume you catch the next bus, and it's on time. I haven't lived in the city for almost 20 years, but I don't believe that the transit has gotten that much more reliable.
And Septa is pretty good as far as transit systems go.
That's not an actually good public transit system. Decent for North America maybe but trash compared to other countries.
Try telling a Manhattanite or someone from a Japanese city that cars are inherently 3x faster for point-to-point trips compared to transit.
Edit: also, why were you buying a week's worth of groceries at a time? I just walk to the bodega as I run out of stuff because it's close enough. It takes a few minutes. Sorry you couldn't see your way out of needing a car but I can pretty much guarantee based on the neighborhood you've described that you could have gotten by without one.
Ah, no true Scotsman it is, then.
So no public transit counts unless it's Manhattan or Japanese? Have you driven in Manhattan? A pogo stick would be faster than driving.
The USA is the country that needs public transit the most. We have 9 cars for every 10 people, and 300 million cars on the road. China has more cars, but only 2.2 cars per 10 people. No other country has more than 100 million cars, and no country with more than 100,000 cars has more cars per capita.
So when we're talking about replacing cars, you cannot simply ignore the entire USA because we haven't developed as much infrastructure as Manhattan.
We want to replace cars AND build actual good infrastructure. The current system heavily favors cars so of course they're more convenient in some ways. In a more balanced and sustainable system the advantages cars have would significantly decrease.
Where did you get the impression that I was talking about "replacing" cars? I said we should replace the urban design approach itself to one which prioritizes walkability over cars. Driving a car rarely be the most practical way of getting from point A to B, but unfortunately it is in most of North America.
What I was responding to was your suggestions that no amount of transit infrastructure or walkability can be good enough to make it so people don't still need a car, and that car travel is inherently more efficient for getting around.
Ikea delivers. And where I'm at, with traffic, the bus or train sometimes becomes a quicker option due to priority lane for busses, and not dealing with parking
Genuinely curious: why do you need a weeks worth of groceries? From living in a big city, albeit in Asia, the benefit of living close to the market is that I can just go pickup what I need for the next few days, and then come back later for the rest.
A few reasons, but the big one is time. It takes less time to shop once a week than it takes to go every few days.
It also lets me save money by shopping in bulk for nonperishable items. I can throw 24 rolls of toilet paper in the trunk of my car, or if there is a sale on frozen vegetables I can stock up.
The other reason is personal, meaning it doesn't apply to everybody, but I have psoriatic arthritis. It comes and goes, but right now I can't walk to the mailbox at the end of my driveway without two tylenol and my cane. Thankfully, I'm not using a wheelchair right now, but using a cane on the bus is no picnic, and it means I have to carry everything with my bad shoulder. With my wife, two kids, and a dog, even a two day shopping trip is probably more than I could carry.
But that's why my wife does most of the shopping lately. Time is still the number one reason.