this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22766 readers
498 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was wondering, since religions are fundamentally social structures built to set hierarchies and justify inequality, and all religious dogma and theology has failed to disprove the null hypothesis of atheism, does it hamper a comrade's integrity if she is conflicted in shedding off her circumstantial religion?

What do you guys think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlpineSteakHouse@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

religions are fundamentally social structures built to set hierarchies and justify inequality

Incorrect, they are subsumed by the existing powers in much the same way that criticism of capitalism today is used to reinforce it. It does not mean that to point out flaws in capitalism is somehow bad or anti-communist.

Religious communes have been the closest thing to communism humanity has created before the industrial revolution, even if they were idealists. The heart of religion is revolutionary, the sigh for a future we can't imagine on earth. Don't confuse your understanding of Christianity in Europe during medieval times as a standard formula for religion everywhere.

[–] silverhand@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The clergy's endorsement of the Divine Right of Kings has its counterparts in all advanced religions and cultures of the world - be it South Asian (Hindu & Buddhist), Middle-Eastern (Islam) or Western (Christianity).

It is not just limited to the European Middle Ages, religious institutions have been defining class status and roles since time immemorial.

[–] AlpineSteakHouse@hexbear.net 3 points 9 months ago

The clergy's endorsement of the Divine Right of Kings has its counterparts in all advanced religions and cultures of the world - be it South Asian (Hindu & Buddhist), Middle-Eastern (Islam) or Western (Christianity).

See "they are subsumed by the existing powers in much the same way that criticism of capitalism today is used to reinforce it. It does not mean that to point out flaws in capitalism is somehow bad or anti-communist."

It is not just limited to the European Middle Ages, religious institutions have been defining class status and roles since time immemorial.

They have also been breaking class status and roles them since time immemorial. The first Christian communities were literal communes that formed autonomous zones in the Roman Empire which was partly the reason they were so violently suppressed. Even in countries where the "official" stance of the church was pro-state, there were hundreds of rebellions against this idea based on those same scriptures.