this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
70 points (81.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9580 readers
322 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wonder if this shift corresponds to the age of automobiles

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nemo@midwest.social 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

As someone with prediabetes, no, not really. The kind of exercise that helps prevent and mitigate high blood sugar levels isn't continuous exertions like walking or cycling. It's more like running up stairs. So if you want to blame elevators...

Well, still don't. It's a dietary problem, not an exercise problem. Otherwise I, a lifelong bike commuter who always takes the stairs and doesn't sit down at work, wouldn't be prediabetic.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

A quick search says cycling lowers the risk by 20% (whatever that means). Gears probably really help here, allowing you to have more resistance with your highest comfortable cadence so you can do cardio.

Either way I don't think the point is that it is a foolproof prevention (because other factors), but more that the same diet but fully sedentary would likely be worse off. Particularly with the obesity aspect, cycling obviously burns calories and builds muscle (which will raise metabolism) so can help you lose weight in the long run. More is probably better so long as you aren't really overdoing it or getting injured.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What if I told you those who own a car are more likely to eat fast food/make poor diet choices?

https://open.bu.edu/bitstream/handle/2144/40250/Fast%20Food-and-SES-EHB-%20Revised_2.pdf

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

Well they already made one really bad choice, so I'd say it checks out!