this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
1358 points (97.0% liked)

Comic Strips

11847 readers
2091 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: Hot Paper Comics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 44 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Tries and fails. It never goes anywhere, and she's mocked as a well-meaning fool for trying in the first place because "welp most elves just enjoy being slaves what can you do shrug emoji". Jkr sets up something with Hermione and the elves and then doesn't follow through with it in any meaningful way (and I don't count commentary from her outside the books as following through) so it's left to just sit there uncritically as "slavery is a thing in this universe and is seen as completely normal by most characters, and only one person ever tries to do anything about it and she's depicted as a cringey radical in the process". Jkr doesn't even show the beginnings of societal change like more elves coming to Dobby's side of things once they see it's an option and that Dobby's is happy that way, or other house elves being motivated to think differently about their situation and starting to unlearn their generations of indoctrination. We don't even see a glimpse of Winky starting to recover instead the last we see of her is as a depressed alcoholic whose life was ruined by her being freed from slavery. Jkr depicts it as "yeah slavery is bad but you can't change the way the world works so might as well not even try." the house elves' servitude is treated as something so fundamentally tied to their species that it seems to be biological and thus humans taking advantage of that is to some degree the natural way of things which, I shouldn't have to explain what the problem with that sort of depiction is. Maybe that wasn't what she intended, maybe she just added slavery because it's a common world building trope, but if that's the case she did so without considering the implications or how it would come across in the end product or the messages it would send.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit. The more I read the less I like that woman. Biologically coded slavery? Sounds like some debunked phrenology bullshit.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you reread the description of the Goblins at Gringots, you'll find typical antisemitic stereotypes too.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Not even just in the writing.

Literally on the floor in the Goblin Bank in the movie.

There's so many fucking racist tropes in the book that once you start glancing around you can't stop seeing them.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Isn’t Winky’s alcoholism also played for laughs? As is Trelawney’s.

It’s weird how casually Harry accepts slavery. All Hagrid has to do is say that Dobby is a weirdo and the slaves like being slaves, then he’s okay with putting Christmas decorations on decapitated slave heads.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Jkr sets up something with Hermione and the elves and then doesn’t follow through with it in any meaningful way

In fairness, this is a common theme across all of JKR's writings after Goblet of Fire.