this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
69 points (91.6% liked)

United Kingdom

4038 readers
232 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Aight. I meant more like "the monarchy can't order the military to detain people, or unilaterally pass decrees against the will of the people".

Asking parliament to pass an abusive law isn't the same type of abuse of power that would justify wanting a monarch to die in the short term in my view.

Charles is not Putin. I'm pretty firmly in the "overthrow the monarchy camp", but that's different from wanting an essentially harmless figurehead of an old man to have cancer.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Charles is not Putin. I’m pretty firmly in the “overthrow the monarchy camp”, but that’s different from wanting an essentially harmless figurehead of an old man to have cancer.

Who wants him to have cancer? You said they have no real power, I showed that they do. Obviously they can't have people thrown out of windows but that wasn't the point I was making.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was more saying we seem to have different definitions of "real power". You're not wrong that they have influence, but the influence they have doesn't seem like "dictator level" power. Simple disagreement of terms.

Given the context of someone asking "is it good the man has cancer", people disagreeing with "there's no real reason to want him to have cancer, so no" are easily mistaken as suggesting that maybe it is good he has cancer.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

"real power" to me, is being able to make the government craft legislation that suits you. I can't do that, can you?

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Yeh, I can actually - I can write to my MP, go and see them in the local surgery and persuade them to table questions and even draft legislation It's quite cool.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

Yes, we've already determined that we have different definitions.

To me, real power would be if they could just choose not to disclose the information.