this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
207 points (85.6% liked)

Technology

59422 readers
2855 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
207
The unstoppable rise of batteries is leading to a domino effect that puts half of global fossil fuel demand at risk (rmi.org)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The unstoppable rise of batteries is leading to a domino effect that puts half of global fossil fuel demand at risk::The unstoppable rise of batteries is leading to a domino effect that puts half of global fossil fuel demand at risk.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 207 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thats a weird way to frame it.

The rise of vaccines puts viruses at risk.

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 89 points 9 months ago (2 children)

As soon as I read the title I thought "did fossil fuel barons write the title because who would phrase it that way?"

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The article is by Rocky Mountain Institute, which is a think tank focused on clean energy transitions. And the rest of the language in the article is much more positive - batteries will enable a shift away from fossil fuels.

So yes, very odd word choice in the title given that the rest of the article generally views fossil fuel displacement to be a good thing.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

It's for the click bait

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

I read the title and thought "Good, but can we do more?"