this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
42 points (93.8% liked)
PC Gaming
8581 readers
527 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion.
PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Epic is not a saint but there are worse companies than them. For example Ubisoft, Electronic Arts, Microsoft + ABK, 2k...
EA is better than Activision, TakeTwo, Ubisoft
Who else is that hands off with devs?
What makes Epic "the most unethical game vendor"? Real question. The criticism I always see is "I already have a library on Steam and don't want two clients", which is understandable, but it!a hardly unethical to just exist.
Edit: Damn, people real don't like you asking totally fair and reasoned questions about the accepted narrative around here, huh?
They did engage in buying out studios to make their games exclusive to their platform. One prominent example was Rocket League, they bought Psyonix and made them discontinue macOS and Linux support, along with delisting the game on Steam
Yeah, that is a pretty shitty, anti-consumer practice. Still not entirely sure I'd give them the award of the most unethical, but that only speaks to the absolute shittiness of corporation, really.
They'te not even the vendor with the shittiest client anymore, ubi stole it with the redesign.
Ubi has been putting in a lot of effort in their race to the bottom lately. Apparently someone in Ubisoft looked at EA and ActiBlizzard and thought "Pfft amateurs".
This is Epic not Valve