this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
230 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

58033 readers
4461 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing reported another problem with fuselages on its 737 jets that might delay deliveries of about 50 aircraft in the latest quality gaff to plague the manufacturer.

Boeing Commercial Airplanes CEO Stan Deal said in a letter to Boeing staff seen Monday that a worker at its supplier discovered misdrilled holes in fuselages. Spirit AeroSystems, based in Wichita, Kansas, makes a large part of the fuselages on Boeing Max jets.

"While this potential condition is not an immediate safety issue and all 737s can continue operating safely”

‘bUT iT’s sAFE’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Determinator@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Look I'm all for the "Fuck Boeing" circlejerk but as someone who actually works QA at an aircraft manufacturer this is likely a whole lot of nothing.

I'd be shocked if you could find a single aircraft of any make in service that didn't have dozens of misdrilled holes.

Without any context this is just fear mongering.

[–] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough, I think boeing has fucked up so much that even something benign is being taken seriously, which is good imho, but it is also kinda scary, what else did they get away with?

[–] Determinator@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Again, I understand the sentiment but this is not an example of them "getting away" with anything.

If anything this is indicative of a healthy Quality Management System given that this condition was identified and contained prior to any impacted articles entering into service.