Technology

59392 readers

2918 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

594

Apple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Bought (nymag.com)

submitted 9 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

278 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're describing the difference between "passthrough" AR, and "look through" (or "optical") AR.

AR and MR or more pretty much interchangeable.

[–] luves2spooge@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think so. For example with true AR you could look at something like a bus and have it tell you information like the schedule, route, if it's running on time etc. This is done automatically and without user interaction. What the Vison Pro does is give you floating apps you can interact with

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

There is nothing about the Vision Pro that prevents that from happening other than they haven't implemented it.

The ~~ability~~ feature to automatically give you information about arbitrary things you're looking at isn't a requirement for "true AR".

I'm not really defending vision pro, it seems pretty limited. But that doesn't make it "not true AR" and MR doesn't mean "crappy/inferior AR"