Rust

5999 readers

4 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

EdTheLegendary@programming.dev

kahnclusions@programming.dev

torcherist@programming.dev

101

Announcing Rust 1.76.0 (blog.rust-lang.org)

submitted 9 months ago by snaggen@programming.dev to c/rust@programming.dev

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lambda@programming.dev 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Do you mind explaining? Maybe with the context of another languages equivalent?

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

let bar: Result<T, E> = ...;
let foo = bar.inspect(|value| log::debug("{}", value));

is equivalent to

let bar: Result<T, E> = ...;
let foo = bar.map(|value| {
    log::debug("{}", value);
    value
});

[–] lambda@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Elegant. Thanks!

[–] xav@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Warning: in the first case "value" is actually a shared reference, not a value.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Looks vaguely like Stream::peek from Java, I think? There's an equivalent method in Iterator::inspect.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

it's just a way to use map with a reference instead of the value, by what I understood.

could be usefull for logging values in a Result so you can see it. However I think you can already do that by just mapping and returning the variable.