this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
400 points (95.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8210 readers
501 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How does that look for other singleplayer games that take some 50-100 hours to beat?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 10 points 7 months ago

Compare Starfield(330.7k > 9.2k) to games like Spiderman remaster(66.4k > 5.1k) or RE4(168k > 2.9k) or Armored Core 6(156.1k > 1.3k) or even a game build with multiplayer and replayability like Elden Ring(953.4k > 47.3k), all in 5 months timeframe, i think it's to be expected as starfield didn't launch with mod tools. The score doesn't looks good tho, as people really don't like the gameplay loop and the loading.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Copied from above comment:

Skyrim base + special edition = 28.5k
Fallout 4 = 18k
Fallout 76 = 8.3k
Starfield = 9.2k

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks. I meant how many percent they lost after 6 months.