this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
263 points (96.5% liked)

World News

36884 readers
1085 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: [ https://archive.is/z7xcs ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skua@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (40 children)

If this war was about having NATO on their doorstep, why is it an invasion of a non-NATO country twenty years after the first neighbours of Russia joined NATO? It's never seriously discussed because it's either a lie or unfathomably stupid, and whichever of those two it is doesn't much matter.

Just for a second, imagine you're a neutral country in eastern Europe. Russia has been fucking with Georgia and Moldova since the fall of the Soviet Union, and now it invades Ukraine for the second time within a decade. Russia has never touched a NATO country despite bordering several of them for literally decades. And then Russia acts all shocked when you say you want into NATO

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (37 children)

Yeah and Russia protested strongly every time. But Ukraine was their red line. Just because you didn't read it in western media doesn't mean it didn't happen.

I don't condone the invasion but it was predictable and a colossal "failure" of diplomacy if you look at it charitably. At worst it was a long term plan to force Russia into a conflict with the aid of western media to obscure the reason why this war was happening. Russia is acting just like the US would.

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (14 children)

plan to force Russia into a conflict

Please explain how exactly do you force someone (who suggests to be reasonable) into conflict, basically force them to invade anyone.

Did the Poland "forced" Hitler to start the WW2 the same way?

[–] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's hardly unprecedented. The USA felt forced into an aggressive response to the Soviets putting missiles in Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It was the other way, the "Cuban" missile crisis happened when USA wasn't happy when USSR responded in kind to USA placing missiles in Turkey. So it should be called "Turkish missile crisis" and really "USA missile crisis".
Just the western popular propaganda conveniently omits who was the instigator of entire issue, but it's not that hard to find.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)