Technology

59422 readers

2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

264

Apple won’t be forced to open up iMessage by EU (www.theverge.com)

submitted 9 months ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

True but shortsighted.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How so? iMessage isn't getting more popular

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Because that way you're always chasing the problem instead of anticipating it. We know how Apple/iMessage behave, there is no point in waiting for them to become a problem.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Ok, agreed with how apple act, but iMessage won't become a problem here, because nobody uses it.

And if they do, which they won't, then apple can be added.

[–] Link@rentadrunk.org 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not sure where you are in Europe but here lots of people use iMessage. If you have an iPhone and want to text another iPhone, it’s usually iMessage.

If they don’t have an iPhone then people fall back to WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger or hell even Discord…

[–] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago

But you wouldn't text another iPhone. You'd WhatsApp the person.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Not enough people use iMessage for it to be covered by this law. It's not large enough of a messenger.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fine, but why we should always wait for something to become (evenatually) a problem ?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Stop saying it's going to be a problem, there's zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can't do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 9 months ago

Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

Ok, I understant that. I am not saying that iMessage will be a problem, I am saying that if it will be ever become a problem, then you are will be in a rush to fix it when you could have simply prevented it.

Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

The law should apply to all chat apps in my opinion.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Yep. They need to have broad competition rules. Not one per instance of competition issues. It's same damn problem again and again; anticompetitive practices. Somehow the anticompetitive practices moving to the digital world means law makes can't see them.

[–] L_Acacia@lemmy.one 4 points 9 months ago

Whatsapp is europe's iMessage