this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1267 points (98.8% liked)
Microblog Memes
5873 readers
2881 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The problem with Apu stems deeper then just the character itself though. He embodies a mix of negative and positive stereotypes, but the biggest problem is the fact that he is written more or less exclusively by white men, and voiced by a white man doing an impression of an Indian accent. I think the character could have been pulled off fine if there had been someone of Indian decent offering creative input and voicing the character.
So, had he been voiced by and written via the consultation of an indian person, the stereotypes would cease to be unacceptable?
I mean kinda yeah. No doubt the character would have been portrayed differently had there been input from someone of Indian decent. Besides that its a general rule in good comedy to not punch down. If you're going to have jokes about a minority culture then it needs to be that culture making jokes about itself. Relatively few people were outraged about the Black stereotypes made fun of on The Boondocks because the vast majority of people involved in creating that show were Black. In the case of The Simpsons, it was just a bunch of White guys sitting around writing jokes about Indian stereotypes and making a silly voice.
I wonder exactly what would've been changed with the input of the average Indian person. What is man that ye shall know him? Would it be Apu or a name with another rose?
I also have a problem with the whole 'punching down/up' nomenclature. As long as the intention is to punch at all, then I think you're coming from the wrong angle, especially as - depending on the trajectory - it seems to try and justify different things. A lot of 'punching down' seems in good spirit, whereas 'punching up' is specifically designed to agitate.
Kind of?
Like making self deprecating jokes is different to another person making fun of you, but with nationalities.
Depending on which nationality. Americans lay into the French like they've forgotten how much they owe them... nobody bats an eyelid.