this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
211 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

31173 readers
335 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/12200311

Signal Finally Rolls Out Usernames, So You Can Keep Your Phone Number Private

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kbal@kbin.melroy.org 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

Whittaker says that, for better or worse, a phone number remains a necessary requisite

Worse. It is for the worse. We sure did wait a long time for this half measure, Signal.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 34 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Is there a reasonable alternative, though? Email addresses? Adding a cryptographic challenge to prevent somebody from generating tons of accounts?

As far as phone numbers go, I'm not a big fan of Signal having them, but I definitely prefer not having to give them out! That change is a huge deal to me, as I can now communicate with people without handing them a phone number. And Signal has provided their client and server source code, along with evidence that their servers store absolutely nothing.

Nowadays, the most likely way your Signal data will get leaked is if somebody screenshots it.

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It’s the signal metadata that they want to keep associated with an identity

They still can fulfill government requests for who is talking to who and how often

[–] cjf@feddit.uk 7 points 6 months ago

Got proof for that last claim?

I thought their sealed sender feature was meant to prevent exactly this scenario.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)