this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
22 points (84.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8242 readers
355 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

To my untrained eye, yeah that's kinda sketch, the skin is peeling off. Definitely get mad at the mantanance people. But it also doesn't look dangerous on its own; it's just a covering for the actual wing.

[–] SaintWacko@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Are we looking at different pictures?

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Flying while missing a whole tail rudder is entirely doable. A hole in a wing just isn't as serious.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That depends on how it affects near-stall flight.

The most efficient cruise that is legal, is 1.30x stall-speed.

If that damage on the leading portion of the wing means your "1.30x" stall-speed cruise is now actually 1.00x, you're gambling.

There was a DC9 that killed everybody because of pebbled ice wrecking its actual-stall-speed, years ago.

Landing also requires that you dance at the edge of stall, & if your idea of where stall-speed is, is wrong, ..

_ /\ _

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)