this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
566 points (100.0% liked)
196
16504 readers
12 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It ticks me off when i see twitch streamers with the fps displayed and its running at 300+ fps. What a waste of electricity, money and hardware.
Eh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.
Turn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
Reflex at 100 fps still won't compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
I wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
Reflex just shaves off the extra overhead you'd get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won't make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
I know, that's exactly what I am talking about
I think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then
you might not see a difference between 100fps and 300fps for example, but the feel is certainly there, because those frames are still being rendered and is more information. it can be the difference between landing a headshot and missing for pro players, even if the refresh rate is lower, so its not wasted at all.
Exactly. Most people aren’t pro players however. I’ve also seen this with games like Baldur’s Gate fwiw.
Not only that but people seem to do it sometimes just to flex, when turning on VSync is an objectively better experience with less screen tearing. There’s ZERO reason to drive 300fps when your monitor is only capable of 144Hz.
vsync sucks, real ones use vrr. god i cant type can i??? i didnt know my comment was horribly misspelled until now
You know the VSync setting had to be enabled in a lot of games for VRR to work right?
I don't hit my monitors refresh rate in any game, I don't need to.