homelab

6602 readers

1 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

CMonster@lemmy.ml

The Reluctant Sysadmin's Guide to Securing a Linux Server (pboyd.io)

submitted 1 year ago by anzo@programming.dev to c/homelab@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It scratches the surface of the most obvious stuff. I'd only add running apps in isolation (docker or adduser) and maybe fail2ban.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you going to elaborate, or…?

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's mostly good advice. Certainly not comprehensive but this is securing servers we're talking about.

[–] Technoguyfication@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, because pretty much all of it is bad. Elaborating would be meaningless.

[–] NateSwift@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Explaining why something is bad advice is as important as saying it is. Otherwise it’s just a pissing match between two random people on the internet. Why also keeps people from making similar problems.

[–] f5xs_bhw0a@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I also want to know, being a beginner sysadmin myself. If you think that his advice is bad and you're not elaborating, I'll be taking his advice because his sounds sane so far.

[–] michael@lemmy.perthchat.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That wouldn't make explaining how even one part of it is incorrect "meaningless".

You just cbf! :)