this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
704 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59656 readers
2669 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
704
HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors (arstechnica.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
169 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors::"Never own a printer again."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know of any open source printers, but Brother laser printers are good. Brother is a 116-year-old Japanese industrial manufacturer. Their printers are simple, reliable, they support their printers for a very long time, and they make linux drivers. AND as far as I know they haven't tried any HP-style fuckery.

[โ€“] stargazer4416@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I also own a Brother printer since I ragequit HP last year. While playing with the settings last week i manually checked the firmware and noticed a possible update. When searching online for the release notes, i found thread after thread of people wanting to revert the update because it blocked third party toners? I hope Brother doesn't go the HP way...