31
Thanks to the admins for not enabling downvoting
(reddthat.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)
Reddthat Community and Support
664 readers
2 users here now
Reddthat Community & Support
This community is for us to chat about anything and everything, including support topics!
There is no defining specific rules for this community and it can be anything from "I do not like the weather" to "I've won the jackpot and want to give all the money away to charity!" ๐
Before posting, have you read the rules?
Introductory Required Reading
For anything else, try a search and see what turns up, if not post away!
Alternative Support Forums:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So you're saying if I'm using service A to access service B, I'm not using service B?
Well in that case, I'm not using reddthat, I'm using lemm.ee, you're right. But I'm not using lemm.ee, I'm using Voyager. Voyager is making requests to lemm.ee on my behalf. If my account were deleted or the server were offline or I were in a tunnel, my comments I wrote in Voyager wouldn't be delivered.
And actually I'm not even using Voyager, I'm using Android. Android simply provides a user interface to access the data on Voyager. And I'm not using Android, I'm using my phone's screen. And I'm not using my phone's screen, I'm using my eyes and fingers, and I'm not using my eyes and fingers, I'm using my brain.
Congratulations, your views on software usage reducto ad absurdum into solipsism.
Welcome to my blocklist.
I'm not arguing about how Lemmy works. We both agree how Lemmy works. I'm arguing the philosophical premise that using an interface to access a remote service counts as using that service. This isn't a technical problem, it's philosophy. Also, appeal to authority fallacy. A very poorly done appeal to authority because the authority isn't relevant to the question.
Yes. I do spend my day worrying about ridiculous admins who use absurd philosophical premises to justify dismissing people's concerns.
I am literally outside right now. I've always felt that "touch grass" and the like have this ableist connotation where you're baselessly accusing someone of poor mental health habits. And besides, some people have disabilities that make it hard to go outside. Agoraphobia, even just plain old mobility disorders make it a bigger ask to say touch grass of go outside. I guess what you're meaning to say is people spend too much time on the internet. It's an insult that disproportionately gets used against queer and autistic people who will get hate crimed if they be themselves in meatspace. Being online is the reason a lot of trans people haven't killed ourselves. I'd be dead if it wasn't for the internet. And I cycle to work every working day, but I suppose you'd still accuse me of mental illness with intent to attack just for needing an online place to be myself. That, or you're just repeating an anti-trans, anti-disabled cliche because you haven't ever thought about the meaning of the words and just know it's something mean to say to an autistic person without seeming like an arse.
You can go through life blaming everyone else for your own actions, but sooner or later someone's going to get sick of your aggressive behaviour.
That's because you came into a discussion slinging insults with zero self awareness. You think a person disagreeing with an authority figure on a matter of politics is a personal insult.
How is it that your definition of an insult is so narrow as to not include your words, but so broad as to include mine? A contradiction to be sure.
This thread is really something, I've been following iy from afar, what a ride