this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
163 points (97.1% liked)

Asklemmy

44156 readers
1319 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] zaphod@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Absolutely not, unless you adhere to pure utilitarianism. Veidt kills untold numbers of innocent people on a self-imposed quest to do what he believes will save humanity. He was a straight up megalomaniac and the only upside is that his murderous actions eventually lead to peace.

[โ€“] Dhrystone@infosec.pub 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But he made himself feel every death, and he saved the entire world from (holds lighter under map)..

[โ€“] arthur@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago

Self imposed pain do not give back nor compensate for the lifes he took.