The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

[–] Blursty@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Yes I read that part. They have no evidence but still want to pretend to believe it, like so many others.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you're saying?