Games

16764 readers

861 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

122

How A Small Video Game Narrative Studio Wound Up At The Heart Of A Massive, Anti-Woke Conspiracy Theory - Aftermath (aftermath.site)

submitted 8 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sweet Baby Inc doesn't even remotely do what many think it does, but on the modern internet, that doesn't matter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination

"The Paradox of Tolerance" is easily solved if you stop thinking of Tolerance as an imperative, and instead as a social contract. Those who do not abide by the social contract of Tolerance are not protected by it.

Therefore Racists, the anti-tolerant, will not be tolerated.

[–] duffman@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you implying "anti racist discrimination" is justified by your quote? I agree with your quote, but it is not supportive of Kendi's quote in the slightest. To discriminate is to "unjustly treat categories of people", so if someone is acting racist and you don't tolerate them, that is not discrimination at all because you are judging them for their actions, not their looks.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

so if someone is acting racist and you don't tolerate them, that is not discrimination at all because you are judging them for their actions, not their looks.

So what is the difference between that and "anti-racist discrimination"?