this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
1587 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

19302 readers
1407 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatoBoram@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I'd argue that if you only know how to start your own project using the play button, then you aren't a software engineer.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 24 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I've written a pretty big application for my employer in visual studio. Never once have I run a "dotnet build" command. Only ever used the little play button. Guess I'm no software engineer

The real software engineers are those who can 2 minute Google "how to build with cli" their Hello world console app.

[–] NatoBoram@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you knew about dotnet build

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbf, I looked it up on Google. I know you can do everything you can with Visual Studio also in the CLI, but never bothered checking out the specific commands. 2 second search on Google returned donet build.

A software engineer isn't defined by what commands he knows or what functions he can remember off the top of his head or what languages he used to write hello world. Those are easily Googlable things that have little to no value irl. The ability to actually solve a problem or build an architecture, a system, even if only in pseudocode is much much more valuable than knowing any specific command.

Case in point, I routinely Google stuff I already used or self reference previous code I've written cause I can't remember how I did certain things. Nothing wrong with that.

[–] NatoBoram@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

There's no shame in being a play-button corporate programmer who's in it only for the money! In fact, most employers prefer this kind of people.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)