Technology

59440 readers

3623 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

333

China to limit teenagers’ smartphone use to two hours a day (www.telegraph.co.uk)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

also bar users under the age of 18 from accessing the internet from 10pm to 6am.

Meanwhile, a tiered system will mean those under the age of eight will be permitted a maximum of 40 minutes of usage a day, with up to two hours permitted for 16 and 17-year-olds.

Children aged between eight to 16 will have their time limit capped at one hour. ‘Teenager mode’

The proposed reforms are open to public feedback as part of a consultation process scheduled to run until Sept 2.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Apps related to China’s emergency services and education will, however, be exempted from the restrictions.

[–] fresh@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What counts as “education”? China recently has the chess world champion. Is studying opening chess moves “education”? I doubt it. Is reading video game websites in English to study English “education “? There are so many useful ways to let people flourish by following their passions.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are so many useful ways to let people flourish by following their passions.

You know that's sort of the opposite of how China operates, right? I mean, to be fair they have 1.4 BILLION people and a very centrally-planned authoritarian government that doesn't have much flexibility. When the Chinese government is doing their planning they'll often designate entire regions of the country like, "these folks will be textile workers" or "these folks will be farmers". The last thing they want is for any large number of people to "follow their passions" because it would completely screw up their plans!

I'm sure they expect--and hope--some useful deviants emerge from their centrally-planned education and economy but I'm positive they'd prefer it if at least 99.9% of the population just falls in line.

[–] fresh@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I am all for criticizing authoritarianism, but I think that’s a bit of an exaggeration (similar things were said of the supposedly “conformist” Japanese in the 80s and 90s). You don’t hear the same things said of the US, even though the US school system is one of the most segregated in the developed world. If you grow up in certain neighborhoods, often along racial lines, you are designated to be a poorly paid service worker, with no real option to follow your passions. Social mobility in China remains higher than in the US.

In any case, we’re mostly in agreement inasmuch as I’m obviously criticizing this bad authoritarian policy in China.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Haha, a lot of educational apps were banned in China already