this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
342 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3610 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Awww poor Musk. Maybe stop helping Russia by giving them access while denying Ukraine. Also fuck you for ruining Twitter .

Edit - apparently coverage on the Crimean coast was never activated. Still dickish for helping Russia. They're sanctioned up the wazoo and this might come back to bite him. Starlink is a recipient of US Federal Assistance and that can easily be leveraged.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 29 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Twitter was never good, it was just popular.

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I like that you can follow scientists and authors directly at the source though.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

I'll grant you that..

[–] aniki@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For what? Is your life in any way any meaningfully different? Why is it important to be connected to people that you don't know, will never know, and will never interact with? Wouldn't a better expenditure of energy go towards fostering relationships with people in your community?

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] aniki@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And that's only possible on twitter?

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At least it's easier.

I think Mastodon kinda has the same setup too, but they had all the issues with server-level cascading blocklists and stuff that put me off.

I don't want to be blocked from seeing the posts of someone I'm interested in on another server just because the admin of my server refuses to block another server which refuses to block posts from servers where some users have posted "offensive" content, etc. - like it's so many levels of separation it's ridiculous.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

yeah the blocklists were a mistake, instead of the interconnected new internet we just got even worse social bubbles and isolation, the only difference from current social networks is that it's not algorithms doing it, but admins.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] aniki@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Message board isn't social media. I don't follow any of you fucks. I don't give a shit.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Then why complain about what another person decides to waste time on the Internet while you're wasting time on the Internet? I'm replying to you while taking a shit so that's multitasking.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Every media that allows you to be social is a social media

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

That's the dumbest fucking nonsense I'll read all day today. Thanks!

[–] Syn_Attck -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Message board isn't social media.

Social. What we're doing now.

Jazzhands Media!

Facebook is just a message board with different features.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes. It's called profiles, that you use to generate links, socially, within your peer group.

Not a fucking message board. You don't get to re-define history just because something new came up.

[–] Syn_Attck 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Reddit and Lemmy are just as much social networks as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn. You don't get to stay in 2010 just because you want to pretend you're not doing something you don't like.

Here, have some links ya kangacup

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemmy_(social_network)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit

https://www.britannica.com/topic/social-media

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

It was by no means perfect, but it did become the defacto town square. The Arab Spring was facilitated in part through Twitter and George Floyd related protests were arranged, amplified and shared through Twitter.

There's plenty of incompetence in Musk, but a significant part of this "effort" was deliberate, as a favor to other like minded billionaires upset and frightened that the people had a working, maturing megaphone. They needed that to be broken, if not fully silenced, and musk was the pathetic piece of shit with daddy issues that the other old money billionaires could convince to do the work here as an attempt to gain their favor.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Like fast food.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago

Which is why I don't understand why the likes of Blue Sky and Mastodon try and copy it. It's a terrible idea.

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thank you. I actually wasn't aware.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's the problem with media today.

I truly don't blame you for not knowing. There were huge headlines for the initial story, and then smaller headlines on the retraction. Then even after the retraction people that KNOW it was retracted still spread it because Issacson must be lying.

Its not just Elon, this happens everywhere.

Get the big headlines, and bury the corrections or clarifications.

Granted, in this case I don't think Issacson was malicious in his original reporting, but it really often is malicious

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I found myself in a huge echo chamber over Brexit. World news on Reddit had me believing that it would never happen.

And yeah, I follow someone for Ukraine news on YouTube. He's pushed some theories that proved to be untrue so I guess that I have to do my own fact checking. Overall he seems to be good, but he seldomly talks about times that he was wrong.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

He denied the request by Ukraine to enable starlink in crimea because "it would make SpaceX explicitly implicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation" it would also have been illegal for him to do so because US sanctions prohibits it. The original claim about him disabling it is false and has been debunked. It wasn't enabled in the first place. He also later added that had the US government asked him to enable it he would have but they didn't.

I also find it hilarious that Russia being able to obtain a limited amount of terminals is somehow proof that Elon is helping Russia but at the same time you're conveniently ignoring the fact that there's thousands of terminals in use on the Ukrainian side which SpaceX sent there for free when the invasion happened. It's not Russia he sent those to but Ukraine.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He didn't send them all for free, they were also funded by the U.S. government. Sanctions say sales of such would be illegal in Russia. So yes, people in Ukraine can legally purchase and use Starlink and people in Russia legally should not be able too.

So any of his terminals being used illegally are in fact his responsibility. They are using his companies satellites which are included in the sanctions.... It doesn't seem very confusing to me

What part of that is confusing

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you know how many terminals SpaceX has already found out to used by Russians and have been disabled? Because I don't but you seem to be implying that they're not doing anything about it, so what are the numbers?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So you claim they are doing something about it and demand someone else find you proof for your claims. Run around with your goal posts all you want.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

I'm not claiming anything. How could I know? I'm assuming they do, but to what extent is anyone's guess. If someone has that strong opinion about it, I think it's only logical to expect them to have a reason for it, such as evidence to the contrary.