UK Nature and Environment

381 readers

42 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

GreyShuck@feddit.uk

Kim@feddit.uk

Much of England’s ‘national landscapes’ out of bounds, say campaigners (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 7 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

England’s most stunning “national landscapes” are largely out of bounds, and 22 of the 34 have less than 10% of their area open to the public, research has found.

The government last year renamed areas of outstanding natural beauty to national landscapes, and said part of their aim was to widen access to nature. Ministers said at the time the new name reflected a recognition that they are not just beautiful but important for many reasons including improving wellbeing.

The National Landscape Association, a government-organised body representing national landscapes and their conservation boards, advertise that “they are the UK’s nearby countryside – 66% of people in England (44 million) live within 30 minutes of a national landscape and at least 170 million people visit them every year”.

However, new research by the Right to Roam campaign has found that only a tiny fraction of most of these beautiful areas are freely accessible for walking and other forms of outdoor recreation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] snota@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Even the areas where there are rights of way, private land owners make it as difficult as possible to follow them.

[–] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There certainly are a good number - but not all - who do. It is counter productive though. If you can't easily follow the route, you are far more likely to end up wandering off it and ending up somewhere they don't want you and you don't want to be.

If they mark it clearly, everyone stays on it and there are no problems.

[–] snota@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I was being a bit unfair and it seems to depend on location. And yes, make it clear and there won't be a problem, but having the problem to complain about gives them credence to the removal of public rights of way.