this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
367 points (97.7% liked)

Games

31358 readers
1846 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

FO4 was...okay imo. It pales in comparison to NV and 3 imo though.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

As someone who couldn't tolerate F3/NV because they paled in comparison to 1/2, I actually really enjoyed 4. It lost a lot of the engine jank and felt like a decent FPS with light RPG mechanics, wearing the aesthetics of Fallout.

Imo, FO4 did everything better than FO3, except the plot. But FO3's plot was already kinda bland to begin with. I mean, back then... It was incredible. But not by today's standards.