this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
641 points (97.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6660 readers
376 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] strawberry@kbin.run 75 points 8 months ago (2 children)

yay mutually assured destruction!

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Russian oligarchs can't spend their money in a nuclear wasteland. Putin's gonna fall down some flights of stairs if he tries anything funny.

Also, the last time a Russian was told to deploy the nukes, he didn't - which was good, because the order was a fluke.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Technically it want an order but malfunctioned alert system. He made a good guess that it's just a glitch and neglected the protocol which saved millions and countries but he got a warning for not following the protocol... Just another day at military I suppose.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Context matters. If there are no escalations happening in world politics, why would there suddenly be an order to launch?

If the same glitch happened while Russian leaders are going hint hint nudge nudge towards their nuclear arsenal, would that operator do the same thing?

Maybe the worst thing about nukes isn't that the button will be pressed on purpose, but that some damn fool thing will happen on accident and things happen before anyone can take stock of the situation.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No idea what you're taking about tbh. As I said there was no order and it was during cold war iirc. Not sure what you mean by Russian leaders using glitch as an excuse. If it happened there would be no one left to blame.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean that right now, Putin is in a war where he's actively reminding the rest of the world that they have nukes to use. If an order comes down to launch now, that's different than an order that comes down when nothing else is happening.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

Yes but I want taking about it? I was replying to someone who mentioned the cold war incident

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is why phrasing is so important... because I did not remember all that, but phrased myself so that you would do the web search...

...THE POWER~!

Thanks though ^; it's pretty wild to think that almost on a fluke, we'd be living in nuclear winter right now.

Like histories dumbest and most impactful "whoopsie doodle".

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He made a decision of the kind you generally have to make when working with systems which can cause mass destruction by design or by error. I'm pretty sure many other people have done similar things in USSR and in USA and in France etc

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Also, the last time a Russian was told to deploy the nukes, he didn’t - which was good, because the order was a fluke.

WDYM by deploy?

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Probably the wrong choice of words. "Launch" is probably the correct word.

[–] CCF_100@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They're all MAD