this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
170 points (95.2% liked)

Public Health

360 readers
2 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But it's good enough for regular people. Very accurate test equipment costs tens of thousands of dollars and you have to recalibrate it every few months using very expensive consumables.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nah. I paid $43 for my lead test via Virginia tech, as that's a concern I have with my new (very old) apt building: https://leadkit.hbbf.org

If you need to test for the common 9 dangerous items test, it's $160: https://mytapscore.com

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's one single test and you don't get equipment. You're just sending your sample to the lab, which has all the stuff. I mean that's a great option, but you're not getting accurate testing devices for that price.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Not interested in having the equipment. Not sure where I said that either.