Privacy

32120 readers

352 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

390

VLC - App stores were a mistake (archive.is)

submitted 8 months ago by ozoned@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

192 comments fedilink hide all child comments

VideoLAN @videolan App Stores were a mistake. Currently, we cannot update VLC on Windows Store, and we cannot update VLC on Android Play Store, without reducing security or dropping a lot of users... For now, iOS App Store still allows us to ship for iOS9, but until when?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Thats what they complain about. They can use it. They dont have to. Yes its bad but they mix up a lot in one post.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

An unacceptable option is not an option. This is like saying somebody has access to multiple Internet providers when one ISP is so slow as to be nearly unusable, but it technically exists and you can technically pay for it. That’s not really what we mean by “choice.”

Your response is so typical and frustrating to be honest. It’s flippant nonsense where you know what we are talking about but you don’t want to agree so you hide behind lazy responses like the one you wrote.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why do Google need the private key? I can only see it being used to modify apps without notice.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Iirc, they build the app and publish it for you. "For convenience and security"

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wow, that is terrible.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Yyes.

With Play App Signing, Google manages and protects your app's signing key for you and uses it to sign optimized, distribution APKs that are generated from your app bundles. Play App Signing stores your app signing key on Google’s secure infrastructure and offers upgrade options to increase security.

https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/9842756?hl=en

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but only because it's Google. Fdroid do exactly the same thing in their repo.

The idea behind it is sound, because otherwise you're putting all your trust in the app developer. By having the store do some basic checks and compile the app the idea is they can guarantee no third party/bad actor has inserted malicious code.

However, this being Google, they are the bad actor.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

No, that is wrong, the app developer signs the app with their private key, sends it to Google, google scans ans verifies the app, and add their signature with their own private key.

The app can thus be verified to have been built by a specific developer and verified by Google before publishing, without breaking trust